Back again with busy images and opaque writing. My intent is to have helpful annotations on my graphics to reduce need to look at the forum message box. I've never polled for preferences, seen or heard them, but I find doing this work is easier and more accurate that way. Note: this stuff I post is a workbook spinoff from an interest I have pursued--still having VAuto treated FL and participated in arguments about meanings of Resmed FL.
Troll posts, alas: You may have scrolled through, read some and want to skip the next few paragraphs with my comments.
Here and now at CT, it's "Flood the zone, litter the thread, drive that ASB pest off, he might 'know something' PR and his posse doesn't and he uses too many 6-letter and even larger words."
The image below is a vertically zoomed copy of the one Morbidus duplicated, unnecessarily, simply to throw another "no TV drop stone" my way. He presents as technically adept, yet did not take seconds of time, in all his swashbucking brash "confidence?", to zoom, see and be honest about presence of--yes, sleep insignificant-- TV drops. The OP image, "guilty by association" with FL, is not clear cut, but PR was and is wrong in denying FL have any relationship to tidal volume drops.
Morbidus is hypocritical in sanctioning, even implicitly seconding PR in remaining silent about the ostensible leader PR's blunder--able silence is the cognizant voice of complicity. Morbius (Mbd) continually quibbles, scours my details to criticize and inflate any flaw he finds or manufactures. He either does not read before criticizing or ....? Cases on point: his claim I provide no actionable ideas or methods how to use info I post and his misrepresenting what I posted about the NED-TV-drop research paper.
I give it to Morbius: Fair enough: my writing, sadly, is obscure and my images too busy. The most recent one posted was an old image that needed updating with duty cycle (dC) concept newly in mind (FL driven by relatively longer I-time). I applied the newer-to-me dC concept to correct my image header attribution of FL duration and severity only to deformed wave shapes. (Its orange colored TVd drops need to be updated and increased too for the higher baseline TV I've noticed now--an earlier oversight along a path striving to understand and share/discuss what I and others see in OSCAR).
The graphic:
Main point: there are TV reductions caused by FL, possibly some by wave shape. The posted image I- and E-curve profiles eliminate duty cycle and RR factors.
It is a zoom of a graphic up thread from the OP thread starter, dataq1. It is my present best shot at dissecting and synchronizing time to show relationship of FL and TV reduction (TV drops, TVd). It relies on Morbius assertion that Resmed TV presented by OSCAR relies on a moving average of 5-waves which, at 13 breaths per minute, span 23 seconds. I simply show a special separate time line on that basis for my and readers' visual inspection and making mental adjustments--could have, I suppose, just snipped and pasted-in the time line curve itself to move it left 23 seconds . I don't know the centering or start of the 5-wave rolling average, but the 23 second shift has to improve
- PR&Morbius-deny-TV-drop-at-a-FL.gif (414.05 KiB) Viewed 1500 times
on its lag in OSCAR graphs.